01.01 - Foundations of Salesforce QA
01.01 – Do You Really Need a Tester in a Salesforce Project?
Free Preview — 01.01: Do You Really Need a Tester in a Salesforce Project?
Testing in Salesforce isn’t about clicking through screens — it’s about understanding how platform constraints shape the entire delivery process.
Many teams underestimate how complex even “simple” requirements can become once automation layers start interacting with each other.
In this lesson, we explore why dedicated QA is not optional, but essential for preventing costly failures later in the project.
Continue reading → (paid content below)
1. Introduction
One of the most common questions asked during early project planning — especially by people unfamiliar with structured testing — is:
“Do we really need a tester on a Salesforce project?”
Project Managers, sponsors, and even experienced consultants may question the necessity of professional testing, often assuming that Salesforce’s built‑in reliability or the simplicity of “point‑and‑click configuration” eliminates the need for dedicated QA.
In reality, effective testing is one of the strongest predictors of project success in Salesforce delivery. Over years of project experience, this skepticism reliably shifts from:
“Why do we need a tester?”
to
“How many testers can we assign to this project?”
This transformation is not theoretical — it directly reflects what happens when stakeholders start to understand the tangible business value added by QA.
This lesson explains why testers are indispensable in Salesforce, what their work actually encompasses, and why quality control is far more complex here than in traditional software testing.
---
2. Why Testing Matters in Salesforce Projects
Salesforce is a powerful platform, but its flexibility creates risk. A seemingly small configuration change may introduce hidden impacts across:
user permissions
record access
automated processes
data quality
UI behaviour
Testers ensure that these impacts are caught early, validated thoroughly, and communicated clearly — long before business users encounter them in UAT or production.
2.1 What “quality” really means
Quality is often misunderstood. In Salesforce delivery, quality can refer to:
discrepancies between requirements and implementation
gaps in business logic revealed through end‑to‑end flows
unintended behaviour in customized UI
missing validations or incomplete field mappings
incorrect data structures causing downstream issues
automation failing only for certain user roles
edge cases that break otherwise “working” processes
Good testers see beyond the “happy path”. They anticipate failure modes, understand interconnected processes, and challenge assumptions.
2.2 Documentation & testability
Salesforce testers often review and help shape documentation — especially user manuals and process definitions. Their perspective helps prevent ambiguity and ensures that requirements are testable.
---
3. QC vs QA — Understanding the Role Correctly
Salesforce projects often misuse the terms Quality Control (QC) and Quality Assurance (QA). Many job descriptions label testers as “QA Engineers”, but the majority of testing tasks fall under Quality Control — verifying that delivered functionality meets requirements.
3.1 QC (Quality Control)
QC is:
step‑by‑step validation
structured defect reporting
systematic verification of feature completeness
ensuring requirements are met
This is what most testers do day‑to‑day.
3.2 QA (Quality Assurance)
QA refers to:
preventing defects before implementation
improving processes
contributing to requirement clarity
optimizing test approaches
providing strategic guidance for delivery teams
Experienced testers gradually take on QA responsibilities, but not all testing roles require them from day one.
Understanding this distinction is crucial — especially for clients and PMs who expect “QA ownership” but only budget for QC execution.
---
4. The Value Testers Bring to a Salesforce Project
4.1 Revealing hidden risks
Even experienced consultants may miss dependencies between:
object model changes
automation layers
security configuration
UI components
Testers catch what others overlook — particularly edge cases and negative paths.
4.2 Protecting business continuity
Salesforce is deeply embedded in operational processes. A single misconfigured validation rule or permission set can:
block sales teams from creating opportunities
prevent service agents from closing cases
stop integrations from syncing data
break automated workflows
generate incorrect reports for management
Testers ensure that business operations never unexpectedly stop.
4.3 Improving user experience
Many UX issues originate from:
inconsistent page layouts
confusing field visibility
too many required fields
missing quick actions
poor error messaging
Testers simulate real‑world usage and highlight friction points that consultants and devs may not see.
4.4 Accelerating delivery
Structured testing:
reduces rework
prevents last‑minute firefighting
provides developers with clear feedback
enables parallelization of tasks
supports predictable release cycles
Projects with strong QA finish faster and with fewer production incidents.
---
5. Why Salesforce Testing Is Not Optional
There is a dangerous myth that Salesforce testing is “lighter” because:
there is no traditional backend
updates are declarative
much is handled “by Salesforce”
That assumption is wrong.
Salesforce testing is hard because:
the platform is extremely interconnected
permissions deeply influence behaviour
automation runs across objects and processes
multiple actors (profiles, roles) must be verified
custom code extends platform limits
declarative tools have hidden constraints
The platform’s strengths create a testing landscape where simple changes may have complex consequences.
---
6. Tester Involvement Beyond Execution
Testers are not only responsible for clicking scenarios. They often contribute to:
6.1 Requirement analysis
Identifying ambiguities, missing actors, unclear logic, or missing acceptance criteria.
6.2 Process consulting
Testers see actual system behaviour and often recommend more efficient workflows.
6.3 Risk reporting
Early identification of:
unstable automation
risky dependencies
inconsistent data models
unscalable processes
6.4 Collaboration
Testers are one of the few roles communicating with every stakeholder:
PMs
Developers
Consultants
Architects
UAT teams
Clients
This cross‑functional understanding is a major asset.
---
7. Summary
Salesforce testers deliver far more than defect reports. They:
ensure business processes work end‑to‑end
reveal hidden risks that others miss
protect data quality and continuity
improve UX and user satisfaction
enhance documentation clarity
accelerate development by preventing rework
The real value of a tester becomes obvious the moment a project runs without one.
Salesforce may be a powerful platform, but without structured testing, even the most robust configuration can break silently — and expensively.
---
End of Lesson 01.01